<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Dmarc exodus: We called it - Valleywag Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:58:29 PST]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:58:29 PST]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/tech/google/dmarc-exodus-we-called-it-235380.php]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Dmarc exodus: We called it]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://valleywag.com/tech/google/dmarc-exodus-we-called-it-235380.php#c958461]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
There's just a small difference (measured in hundred$ of million$) between (basically) "OWNING" differentiated content (Youtube essentially as publisher) and merely being the marketplace/ middleman (dMarc).</p>
<p>
- zen :$</p> <p>zen</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[zen]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[34:235380:c958461]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:58:29 PST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>